RAW vs. JPEG

RAW vs. JPEG

I hate that my first post in so long is just a re-post but this is such a good article.

I personally see RAW as the digital equivalent to a film negative.  It needs to be developed but you can do so much with it when you do develop it.
JPEG is like a Polaroid. It comes out ready to use but you’re at the mercy of the camera’s developing process for the final result.

Off topic:  If you still have the ever rare Polaroid camera, don’t shake it as “Outkast” suggests. Shaking never caused a Polaroid to develop faster, it just smears the developing fluid giving you a soft unsharp picture.  Also rubbing the surface while developing smears the fluid and development.
Although purposeful smearing can make a great artistic effect. 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s